Newspaper Framing of Issues in the 1999 Yoruba-Hausa Inter-ethnic Conflict in Sagamu

Authors

  • Semiu Bello Department of Mass Communication, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago Iwoye, Nigeria
  • Lai Oso School of Communication, Lagos State University, Ojo, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46881/ajh.v5i0.227

Keywords:

, Conflict, conflict reporting, Sagamu community, Yoruba-Hausa ethnic groups, media framing, 1999 Yoruba-Hausa conflict.

Abstract

This study examines the characterisation of issues in the 1999 Yoruba-Hausa inter-ethnic conflict in Sagamu, south-western Nigeria. The occurrence of the1999 Yoruba-Hausa conflict in Sagamu had some historical significance. It was the first inter-ethnic conflict that occurred two months after the enthronement of democracy in Nigeria in 1999. Furthermore, it was the first inter-ethnic conflict between the Yoruba and the Hausa in Sagamu community after many centuries of peaceful co-existence. Therefore, the authors investigate how four major Nigerian national newspapers, National Concord, The Guardian, The Punch and Nigerian Tribune reported and characterised issues during this conflict. The study triangulates between indepth interview and content analysis research methods for data gathering in order to unpack issues embedded in the research questions. Theoretically, the study explicates framing theory given its relationship and appropriateness to the characterisation of issues in the selected newspapers in relation to the conflict. This study finds that the largest number of the stories analysed were characterised and framed around disunity and disintegration while death and economy dominate the themes that were reported in the selected newspapers over other themes. Therefore, the study concludes that, the strategic position of a newspaper is a considerable factor that should propel journalists to place high premium on social responsibility, public service and accountability in conflict reporting.

References

Ajibua, M. A., Oladitan, I. O., Adesina, O. T., & Bewaji, O. B. (2013). A strategic content analysis of media reporting on sports in Nigeria: A case study of national newspapers. Journal of Education and Practice, 4 (16), 31-37.

Ayodele, O. (2000). Sagamu: Migration to Year 2000. Sagamu: Ayodele Commercial Enterprises.

Batziou, A. (2011). Framing ‘otherness’ in press photographs: The case of immigrants in Greece and Spain. Journal of Media Practice, 12(1), 41-60.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7th ed.). Abingdon:Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction

and Application. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative,

quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

Dragomir, M., & Thompson, M. (2012). Mapping digital

media in Nigeria: A report by the Open Society Foundations. In M. Dragomir & M. Thompson (Eds.).

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a

Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication,

3 ( 4 ) , 5 1 - 5 8 . d o i : 1 0 . 1 1 1 1 / j . 1 4 6 0 -

1993.tb01304.x

Gillespie, M. (1995). Television, ethnicity, and cultural change.

New York: Routledge.

Hodkinson, P. (2010). Media, Culture and Society: An Introduction USA: SAGE,.

Lee, D. T. F., Woo, J., & Mackenzie, A. E. (2002). The cultural context of adjusting to nursing home life: Chinese elders’ perspectives The Gerontologist, 42(5), 667-675.

McCombs, M. E. (1992). Explorer and surveyors: Expanding strategies for agenda setting research. Journalism Quarterly, 36, 176-187.

McCombs, M. E. (1997). New frontiers in agenda setting:

Agendas of attributes and frames. Mass Comm Review, 24(1&2), 32-52.

Olubomehin, O. O. (2012). Ethnic and Communal Clashes in Nigeria: The Case of the Sagamu 1999 HausaYoruba Conflict African Research Review, 6(3), Pp.

-149.

Rubin, I. S., & Rubin, H. J. (2004). Qualitative Interviewing:

The Art of Hearing Data (2nd ed.).

Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57(2007), 9-20.

Schroder, K. (1999). The best of both worlds? Media

audience research between rival paradigms. In P.

Alaasutari (Ed.), Rethinking the media audience (pp.

-68 ). London: SAGE Publications.

Sobowale, I. (2008). Scientific journalism. Lagos, Nigeria:

Idosa Konsults.

Tankard, J., Hendrickson, L., Silberman, J., Bliss, K., & Ghanem, S. (1991). Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Ed u c a t i o n i n Jo u r n a l is m a n d Ma ss

Communication, Boston, MA.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (1998). Mixed methodology:

combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

Weiss, D. (2009). Agenda setting function. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Communication Theory (pp. 32-34). London: SAGE

Publications

Downloads

Published

2021-02-14

Issue

Section

Articles