SYMBOL ERROR PROBABILITY OF 16-QAM SYSTEM OVER AWGN AND RAYLEIGH FADING CHANNELS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46881/ajsn.v7i0.154Keywords:
Symbol error probability, Quadrature amplitude modulation, Rayleigh fading, wireless communication, noiseAbstract
Wireless communication had transformed the mode of human interactions in recent times, distance is no longer a barrier as messages can be sent several miles apart within few seconds. In addition, the pervasive adoption of mobile communication system had engendered researchers to device new and effective technologies to enhance Quality of Service (QOS) offered by service providers. This is obvious in the deployment of trending mobile generations such as 2G, 3G and 4G systems for high speed voice and data services. Nevertheless, these systems are still embattled with unpredictable impairment such as noise in fading channels that impedes optimal system performance. In this paper, performance evaluation of 16–Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (16-QAM) system over Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) and Rayleigh Channels using simulated and theoretical approach is presented. Theoretical mathematical expression for Symbol Error Rate(SEP) was derived, and simulation was setup using MATLAB/SIMULINK for performance evaluation. The results show that SEP is dependent on signal-noise-ratio (SNR) for both methods. However, SEP wasvery high for Rayleigh channel as compared with AWGN.References
Chy, D. K., & Khaliluzzaman, M. (2015). Evaluation of SNR for AWGN , Rayleigh and Rician Fading Channels Under DPSK Modulation Scheme with Constant. International Journal of Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 3(1): 7-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j. wcmc.20150301.12
Essop, A., & Xu, H. (2015). Symbol Error Rate of Generalized Selection Combining with Signal Space Diversity in Rayleigh Fading Channels. South African Instistute of Electrical Engineers, 106 (December), 201-211.
Ezea, H. U., Adebusuyi, K., Ofusori, T., & Ezea, U. R. (2018). An Investigation of the Impacts of Phase Noise on Symbol Error Rate in Quadrature Amplitude Modulation Systems. FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(1):67-71.
Kim, C. J., Kim, Y. S., Jeong, G. Y., Mun, J. K., & Lee, H. J. (1996). SER analysis of QAM with space diversity in Rayleigh fading channels. ETRI Journal, 17(4):25-35. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.96.0196.0043
Krishna, P., Kumar, T. A., & Rao, K. K. (2016). M
QAM BER and SER Analysis of Multipath Fading Channels in Long Term Evolutions ( LTE ). International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 9(1):361-368.
Marvin K. Simon, M.-S. A. (2000). Digital Communication over Fading Channels.
Ndujiuba, C. U., Oni, O., & Ibhaze, A. E. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Digital Modulation Techniques in LTE 4G Systems. Journal of Wireless Networking and Communications, 5(2):60-66. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jwnc.20150502.02
Omijeh, B. O., & Eyo, I. (2016). Comparative Study of Bit Error Rate of Different M-ary Modulation Techniques in AWGN Channel. American Journal of Networks and Communications, 5(5):82-90. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnc.20160505.11
Proakis, J. G., & Salehi, M. (2008). Digital Communications. McGraw-Hill Higher Education (Vol. 49).
Stewart, B., Barlee, K., Atkinson, D., & Crockett, L. (2015). Software Defined Radio Workflow Using MATLAB & Simulink and the RTL-SDR. Retrieved from All Papers/Other/Software_Defined_Radio_usi ng_MATLAB_S... - Software_Defined_Radio_using_MATLAB Simulink_and_the_RTL-SDR.pdf
Yu, H., & Wei, G. (2010). Symbol error probability of cross QAM in rayleigh fading channels. IEEE Communications Letters, 14(5), 375377. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM. 2010.05.100162